I am going to be direct with you. I see firm owners on LinkedIn posting obvious AI slop every single day, and it is hurting their reputation more than they realize.
I am not against using AI. AI is a powerful tool that makes content creation faster and more sustainable. What I am against is lazy AI use, the kind where you paste a prompt into ChatGPT, copy the output, and post it without editing. That kind of content has very specific tells that your audience can spot in two seconds. The em dashes show up everywhere. The sentences are oddly parallel and choppy, with one short statement followed by a contrasting short statement. The phrasing is generic enough to apply to any industry. The advice is technically correct but completely lacks any real opinion or experience.
When a prospect sees a post like that on your profile, the trust you have spent months building evaporates instantly. They think to themselves that if you outsource your thinking to a robot, you will probably outsource the work on their books to a robot too.
Here is the prompt method I personally use, and I recommend it to every firm owner I work with.
First, find a post you actually like. It can be from another accountant, from a creator in a different industry, or from anyone whose writing voice you admire. Give that post to AI and ask it to analyze the writing style, the tone, the structure, the pacing, and the way the author opens and closes their thoughts. Make AI do the homework on what makes that post work.
Second, dictate your own raw insights using a tool like Wispr Flow. This step is the one most people skip. Open your dictation tool and just talk. Talk about a client you worked with last week, an insight you had during a reconciliation, a frustration you have with how most bookkeepers handle a particular issue. Get your real thoughts out of your head and into text in your own voice.
Third, give those dictated insights to AI along with the style analysis from step one. Ask AI to rewrite your insights in the style of the original post you admired. What happens here is interesting. AI breaks out of its default template because you gave it a concrete example to follow. It does not rely on generic web information because you gave it your own specific insights. The post that comes out sounds like you because it actually is you. AI is just helping you format and tighten the writing.
Fourth, edit the output. Cut anything that does not sound like something you would actually say. Add back any rough edges or personal phrasing that AI smoothed out. The goal is a post that feels human, not polished into oblivion.
This is the difference between using AI as a writing partner and using AI as a replacement for thinking. The first builds your reputation, the second destroys it.
If you want help building a sustainable AI-assisted content workflow that still sounds like you, schedule a call and we will set one up together.